Commons e Religião: "jogaremos cantos ao invés de oferendas no mar"

http://atarde.uol.com.br/opiniao/noticias/1734286

Ecologia da Música: 'Children learn through play, but adults play through art'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p033smwp

Brian Eno: 'Children learn through play, but adults play through art', BBC John Peel lecture - 2015

27 September 2015, Briitsh Library, Radio Festival, London, United Kingdom

When I started thinking about this talk a few weeks ago, I found myself writing the strange sentence, something about 'the creative industries'. And I thought, 'industries'? That’s not really quite the right word for what I think I’m doing. And I started wondering about the genesis of that term. I can sort of understand why it’s used because, you know, people who work in the creative arts are always desperate to try to get a little bit of money from government, and apparently the way of convincing them that they should give you some money is to tell them that you’re an industry. If you’re an industry, that means you’re part of the economic framework and that everything you do can ultimately be expressed as a single number. Like your contribution to GNP or the number of jobs that you provide or things like that - the number of Number Ones you’ve had. I thought this is the sort of the beginning of the end of the arts, really: if we start to try to make things expressible by single numbers in that way, what we also do, by the same token, is we start to think that things that can’t be evaluated in that way are actually not worth anything. Now I saw a sort of example of this, I thought, a few weeks ago when the Education Secretary said she thought that it was a good idea for students not to go into the arts and humanities because they didn’t offer such good job prospects as the STEM subjects. Now, this word 'STEM' is quite interesting. It stands for Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics - all things that I’m very sympathetic to and interested in. But there’s an idea around that those are actually the important things.

Even the acronym gives it away, you know, the idea of stem, the thing that’s at the centre which everything else grows off from. So the idea is that those things are important, they’re part of the sort of economic mill and they’re part of what makes Britain great and increases our GNP and what have you. And the arts, on the other hand, are sort of nice. You know, they’re a bit of a luxury, actually - something you might do when you’re relaxing after you come home from a hard day’s work at a proper job.

So I thought that attitude was part of what this comes from, this new idea of the arts as a kind of economic entity. And the other idea, I think, that's underneath that, what Nicky Morgan said – though by the way I shouldn’t crucify her about this, it was an off-the-cuff comment and maybe she doesn’t really think what I say – but she did say it. The other sort of message there is that, anyway, even if you did think the arts were important, they’re so sort of untamed and random and individualistic that there’s really nothing you could do about improving and encouraging the arts. It’s not the affair of the state, essentially, was the message I got. The arts is just something that sort of unfettered individuals go into, and brilliance spouts out of their head like oil out of an oil well or something like that.

So I want to talk about two questions tonight. The first one is, is art a luxury? Is it only a luxury or does it do something for us beyond that? And the second question is, is there a way that you can create a situation in which the arts flourish. If you think they’re important, perhaps you should be encouraging them in some way. So those are the two things I’m going to address: now to address those I have to come round it in quite a long way around. Essentially I think we need to rethink how we talk about culture: rethink what we think it does for us and what it actually is. We have a complete confusion about that. It’s very interesting. If you talk to 20 scientists – and this is the experiment I’ve done by the way - and say to them, 'what do you think science does?', they pretty much all agree. You’ll get 20 versions of a very similar answer. It’s to do with understanding something about the world. If you talk to 20 artists and you say to them, 'what do you think art does?' you will probably get about fifteen different answers. And there’ll be a couple of repeats. So here we all are engaged in the creative industries, but at the centre of this is a subject that none of us really have a very clear idea about. What are we doing when we make art, and what are we doing when we consume it? So I’m going to start with a definition of culture. This is treading on very thin ice because a lot of people have attempted this and a lot have failed. So I’m going to make a quite narrow definition of culture. And I’m going to call culture the creative arts. But I’m going to make a very broad definition of what art is. And my definition is quite simply art is everything that you don’t have to do.

Now what I mean by that is that, there are certain things you do have to do to stay alive. You have to eat, for example. But you don’t have to invent Baked Alaskas or sausage rolls or Heston Blumenthal. So you have this basic activity that we and all other animals do, which is called eating, but then unlike all other animals, we do a lot of embroidery and embellishment on top of it. We make eating into a complicated, stylised activity of some kind. You have to wear clothes. But you don’t have to come up with Dior dresses or Doc Marten boots or Chanel little black frock, whatever it’s called. You can tell I haven’t got one. So, once again we have an essential need - clothing ourselves – which we then do with intense sort of interest. We stylise and embellish and ornament and decorate.

Movement. We have to move. But we don’t have to do the rumba, the tango, the Charleston and the twerk. So even something as straightforward as movement we, as humans, elaborate it into area of stylistic activity, essentially. So the basic activity is movement. What we like to do with it is to stylise it in lots and lots of different ways.

And communicating is the same way. You know, we all have to communicate, because we’re humans and we live in co-operative groups. But, in fact, we do a lot more than just communicate: we write epic poems and pop songs and symphonies and advertising and so on and so on. So, again, with communicating we do a lot of additional stuff on top of just communicating.

And all of that stuff, what’s characteristic of it is that it’s highly stylised. And it’s not only highly stylised, but it’s not randomly stylised either. We care a great deal about what we’re doing. For instance, people will say to you – and almost mean it – 'I wouldn’t be seen dead in that'. Or they might say, 'I don’t think I could live without my Bjork albums'. Or similar things like what. 'What colour shall I dye my hair? It’s a real crisis.' So people invest a lot of their thinking into how they style themselves. And, in fact, we all show that. Nobody here is dressed randomly and nobody – I can’t see you very well – but I don’t think anybody has a random hair cut either. If anybody does, I would really like to see it.

So I think there’s a whole lot of things that we do which you might just call stylisation. But what I want to persuade you that they are actually part of this very broad definition of art as I’m using it. I made a list of things that I would put under that umbrella. Symphonies, perfume, sports cars, graffiti, needlepoint, monuments, tattoos, slang, Ming vases, doodles, poodles, apple strudels, still life, second life, bed knobs and boob jobs. All of those things are sort of unnecessary in the sense that we could all survive without doing any of them, but in fact we don’t. We all engage with them.

So the first question is, why is any of that important? Why do we do it? And notice it’s not only us relatively wealthy people, in terms of global wealth, who are doing it - it’s everybody that we know of. Every human group we know of is spending a lot of their time – in fact almost all of their surplus time and energy – is spent in the act of stylising things and enjoying other people’s stylisations of things. So my question is, what is it for? In fact, my friend Danny Hillus, who’s a scientist, was asked by a well-known science website, along with about 300 other scientists, he was asked what is the most interesting scientific question at the moment? A lot of the other people replied with things about the cosmological constant and Ryman’s Hypothesis and all these very complicated things. And his question was very simple: he said why do we like music? And if you start thinking about that, that is really one of the most mysterious things you can imagine. Why do we even have an interest in music? Why do we have preferences? Why do we like this song better than that one? Why do we like this Beethoven sonata better than that Beethoven sonata? Why do we like this performance of that same sonata better than that other performance? We had very fine distinctions about things that we prefer, aesthetic things. And, yet, none of it seems to have much to do with functionalism, with staying alive and certainly not with industries I would say.

So, as I say, we’re all doing it and we’re all thinking about it. What are we actually doing?

So I want to look at what children do. If you watch children playing what they’re doing mostly is 'let’s pretend'. Let’s pretend this stick can change you into a frog. But if you have this bottle top and you shine it at me, I can’t fly any more. Something like that. Those are the kind of games that children like to play. And they play them absolutely incessantly. And everybody sort of intuitively knows that children playing is important. It’s how they learn. We also know that if we don’t let children play, they don’t develop well. It’s the process of acclimatising that a child is going through.

So, when a child is saying 'let’s pretend', what they’re really saying is 'let’s imagine'. Imagining is possibly the central human trick. That’s what distinguishes us from all other creatures. We know from quite careful study now that the amount that other animals can imagine is very, very limited compared to ours. We can imagine worlds that don’t exist. We can not only imagine them, we can imagine what is going on within them. We can change details, we can say 'okay, I’ll make it this instead of that and then see what happens'. So we can play out whole scenarios in our head in imagination. And that, of course, makes us able to experience empathy, for example. By definition, empathy is having the feeling of what the world is like in somebody else’s head. Well you can only do that, really, if you are skilled at this job of world-building.

And children start world-building as soon as they can do anything. They start it very, very young indeed. So they’re exercising this great talent of imagination. They’re becoming humans, actually. They’re growing out of being animals and they’re becoming humans. And they spend a lot of time doing it and until we send them to school and tell them to actually start learning, they’re doing fine at it. I often wonder what would happen if we just let them carry on doing that. Sort of like they do in Finland, I think, which has the highest educational attainment rate in the world, I believe. In Finland you don’t start to learn to read until you feel like learning to read, which can be seven or eight years old. Anyway, I wouldn’t go on about education, sorry. There’s a lot to get through.

But I do want to keep this idea of imagination in mind that the thing that humans are doing, especially young humans are doing, when they play, is imagining. They’re learning to imagine. They’re learning to think about how other worlds could be. You think about this world by imagining alternatives to it. And you think, of course, about futures by imagining how the world could turn out. It could be like this. If this happens, it could be like that. This is why we can make bridges and have football teams and design weddings and have parties and have governments and so on and so on - because we can imagine those things.

Now my first point is to say that children learn through play, but adults play through art. So I don’t think we stop playing. I think we just carry on doing it, but we do it through this thing called 'art'. And so the reason I made that big list of things - which could, of course, have been endlessly long - was because I want to say that all of those things, from the most exalted (with inverted commas) like symphonies, to the most mundane like cake decoration or nail painting or something like that, they are all doing the same thing. They are all the construction of little worlds of some kind. Okay, so you’re thinking how’s nail decoration a world?

Let’s start in the obvious sort of example. Novels and films. It’s very obvious when you read a novel that what you’re doing is immersing yourself in another reality of some kind. You know, if you read Little Dorrit or something by Dickens you’re in the 19th century, you’re in the culture of debtors’ prisons, the poorest people in London. And the effect of that, of course, could be dramatic on a reader. It was very dramatic on Dickens’ readers, most of whom were probably people who hadn’t experience debtors’ prisons and who were shocked by what they read and who developed a kind of empathy for the people portrayed there. So they suddenly understood that there was a class of people that they had not seen much of, tended to ignore who, to their surprise, had the same sorts of feelings that they had: the same triumphs and the same disappointments.

So, in that case, you know, the immersion into a world has a distinct social effect. It makes you understand that those other people don’t live in quite the same world as you and to have some sympathy for the one that they are in.

Similarly a novel by, say, Neil Stephenson or Will Self or somebody like that, builds a world that doesn’t actually exist, that never existed. It’s a new world, it’s an imaginary world. Once again, by immersing in that, you are not only increasing your ability to imagine and flex your muscles, your mental muscles in worlds, but you’re also always looking back at the world you’re actually in. Making comparisons. So I think it’s easy to see in those cases books, films, things that have words essentially, what the message is. That you’re being invited to enter a world and enjoy it and learn something from it.

It’s not so obvious in, for example, hair styles. So I like hair styles as an example because we all have them – well not quite all of us. But if you think about what’s going on when you choose to wear your hair one way rather than another, what you’re really doing is saying I belong to this particular world where this kind of hairstyle would exist. You’re broadcasting something, but you’re also very alert to all the other hairstyles that you see around you. So you’re in receive mode as well. And what I think you’re doing then is you’re positioning yourself in all the possible stylistic worlds that could exist, you’re taking a certain position. And that’s an identification for yourself, it’s an identification for other people as well.

There’s an American aesthetician called Morse Peckham who I was very interested in. He wrote a book called Man’s Rage For Chaos: Biology, Behaviour And The Arts. And he says in it, 'Art is the exposure to the tensions and problems of a false world in order that man may endure the tensions and problems of the real world.' So I’d actually go a bit further than Peckham – probably even as far as Bromley or Lewisham – and say it’s also the exposure to the joys and freedoms of a false world in order that we might recognise those and locate them in the real world.

So, I like this idea of art having a serious function in our lives and I think this might be one of them. I don’t think it’s the only one, by the way, but I’ve only got 40 minutes.

I was on a bus a few weeks ago and there were two ladies sitting behind me. They were talking about some TV soap that they’d been watching. And it turned out that in the last night’s edition of the soap one of the characters had been revealed as a lesbian. And this was quite a big surprise, because apparently she hadn’t shown those tendencies before. At least not during the broadcast hours. And I was listening to these ladies talking about this. And I realised that because it was a soap opera they were able to talk about it in a way they couldn’t ever do if it was something that actually was connected to them. If it was their daughter or their auntie. Or if it was either of them. So they were able to discuss this piece of art, which may have been Coronation Street, I don’t know. And to discuss the issue that it had posed on that particular occasion with a neutrality - and actually a sense of fun because they both thought it was very funny - that you probably wouldn’t be able to accord to a real-life event. It would be too sensitive. And I suddenly thought okay, so one of the things that art is doing for us all the time – again I’m using that very broad definition of art – it’s giving us a chance to have feelings about things that are not dangerous.

When you go into a gallery, you might see a most shocking picture. But actually you can leave the gallery. When you listen to a terrifying radio play you can switch the radio off. So one of the things about art is, it offers a safe place for you to have quite extreme and rather dangerous feelings. And the reason you can do that is because you know you can switch it off. So art has a kind of role there as a simulator. It offers you these simulated worlds – a little bit like a plane simulator, you know - the reason you have simulators for learning to fly a 747 is so that you don’t crash too many 747s - you can have a crash and get out and laugh. Well it’s true of art as well.

There’s a book by an American historian called William McNeil. It’s a very, very nice book called Keeping Together in Time. And its subtitle is 'Dance And Drill In Human History'. And in that book he talks about the intense pleasure humans feel in muscular coordination: in dancing, in marching together, in carnivals, in all the things where a lot of people synchronise themselves. And I was thinking about that in relation to the two ladies on the bus. And I was thinking what they’re really doing is synchronising. You know, we live in a culture that is changing so incredibly quickly. I was thinking about this the other day and I thought probably in a month of our lifetimes we have about the amount of change that there was in the whole of the 14th century. So we have to somehow come to terms with all of that. None of us have the same experiences: you know you might know a lot about what’s happening in cars and you might know a lot of what’s happening in medicine and you might know something about mathematics and you might know something about fashion. None of us are at all expert on everything that’s happening. So we need ways of keeping in synch, of remaining coherent. And I think that this is what culture is doing for us and as I said, culture is the creative arts so far as I’m concerned.

So, I’m starting now to propose the idea of culture as a sort of collective ritual, or a set of collective rituals that we’re all engaged with. So this is a short explanation of why I think the arts are worth pursuing for other than GNP reasons. You know, I think that the problem, as I said earlier, about the GNP argument is that, okay it’s nice to know that we’ve all contributed £28 billion, I think it was last year, to the Gross National Product. But it isn’t the most important thing. The most important thing is that we have been altogether – that doesn’t mean just 'the artists', so called, it means everyone, it means all the people actually in the community, everybody – has been generating this huge, fantastic conversation which we call culture. And which somehow keeps us coherent, keeps us together. If you will accept that that might be correct, then you might also think well, it sounds pretty important, that job.

So how does it come about, how do ideas come about? Where does art come from? Is it just out of thin air, as libertarians and laissez faire-ists tend to think? Romantics as well. They imagine that people like Beethoven walk about with symphonies in their head and they all sort of just burst out into reality by some unstoppable, divine force. I don’t think that’s how it happens.

And I went to a show about 25 years ago now, at the Barbican. Of early-20th-century Russian painting. It was an area of painting that I particularly loved – in fact it was my period, really, that I loved thinking about and looking about and I thought I knew quite a lot about it. I went to this show at the Barbican and there were probably 150 artists in there, including all the big names like Kandinsky and Tatlin and Rodchenko and so on and so on. And I would say that 70 of the artists in there I’d never heard of. And they were really good. And I thought that’s so mysterious, why didn’t I know about any of those people? And so I thought there must have been so much going on at that time and the differences between the ones who survived into history – like Kandinsky – and the ones who you’ve never heard of, was very small. There were a lot of people making great pictures then. So I thought how did that come about? Why was there so much going on at that time? And I started reading about that period in history in Russia.

Well, one of the reasons that went on was because it had a lot of help. There were a lot of collectors. They put a lot of money into the scene, but there were a lot of hangers-on as well. What would normally be called hangers-on. There were people who had nice apartments that artists could meet and have parties in, or people who rented salons. There were people who had empty places where you could have a show. You know, even if you weren’t very well known. There were galleries that went out in competition with one another to poach the newest, the best young artists. There was a whole thriving scene around the artists themselves. And that thriving scene was actually what produced all this work, I think.

I came up with this word then. Which I still use, which is the use 'scenius'. So genius is the talent of an individual, scenius is the talent of a whole community. And I think, you know, in history you see many examples of great sceniuses, like that point in the Renaissance when Rafael, Michaelangelo and da Vinci were all alive at the same time and in the same cities. Or British pop culture, actually. British pop culture in various times has been that kind of scenius where suddenly all sorts of talents and opportunities came together. And you get something that is actually an ecosystem.

Now, this thing about ecosystems is that it’s impossible to tell what the important parts are. It’s not a hierarchy, you know. We’re used to thinking of things that are arranged in levels like that, with the important things at the top and the less important things at the bottom. Ecosystems aren’t like that. They’re richly interconnected and they’re co-dependent in many, many ways. And if you take one thing out of the ecosystem, you can get a collapse in quite a different place. They’re constantly rebalancing. And I feel that culture is like that. And I think that British musical culture in particular has been like that.

So my thought the other night, when I was walking home was, new ideas are articulated by individuals, but generated by communities. What we tend to do is – perhaps quite naturally – celebrate the individuals. We’re very keen on the names. But what we don’t do is to look at the whole community that they’re drawing from.

Now I’m going to give you as an example of this my own story in a very potted form. Usually when people tell their story, they make it seem like they did it all themselves. 'I did it my way. I’m a self-made man.' It’s particularly notable among high-tech billionaires who tend to think that they started the world. So my story is like everybody’s story and very complicated and I’m just going to look at certain particular parts of it. When I was 11, I passed the 11 Plus and because I was of Catholic parents I got a scholarship to a Catholic Grammar school. Like many schools, it had set aside a few places for bright, working-class boys I believe was the phrase. Then I went to art school. The art school was free. We didn’t pay fees then. I spent five years at art school. Absolutely invaluable time. I studied with some great teachers, some of whom, incidentally, had taught Pete Townshend, who was one of the first in this series of lectures. I left art school and I went on the dole. This was a very important part of my life. And I went on the dole because I desperately didn’t want to get a job. Because I was worried if I got a job, I would never get out of the job. And I wanted to be an artist. I was very clear about that.

So I stayed on the dole and doing odd jobs and had the great good fortune of meeting Roxy Music. So I had luck. Joined a wonderful group of people. And then, another great piece of good fortune, which I know was mentioned in the introduction here, was that John Peel came to one of our early shows, and put us on the radio. A writer called Richard Williams heard it, wrote about it. A big piece. Which was pretty unknown at the time because we didn’t have management record company or even fans, actually. And then, of course, John Peel was one of the reasons I’m here, actually, because he was a key figure in my life. And then the other thing that I should mention that kept me going during that time was the NHS and the Library Service.

So, I mention all of those things. They’re not the only things in this story, of course, but they’re important in a way because they were all institutions that had been set in place a long time ago by people who had some sort of idealistic notion of social engineering. Lord Reith, setting up the BBC, had the idea that the whole nation would benefit from being a part of this new idea of radio, that ideas could be spread around differently. A lot of the way people are talking about the internet now.

The scholarship system was a piece of social engineering from some sort of long term generosity of mind of the people who set up that school. The dole, you know, why does the dole exist? It exists because somebody thought it was repulsive that people should be poor in a society where there was a lot of money going around, that some people should be very, very poor. It seemed objectionable. Doesn’t seem objectionable to a lot of people these days, which is interesting. So these forms of social engineering appeared and, as I say, I think they represent a sort of altruism, a generosity towards the future, which I think is just starting to find its time now.

We are now in a new era. We come from an era of scarcity, basically, economic scarcity - and when all of economics is based on the idea of scarcity and the idea of competition for resources. What we’re moving into, I think – this is explored in Paul Mason’s book Post Capitalism and in David Graber’s books and various other people are writing about it. What we’re moving into is an era of abundance. And co-operation. We’re super-productive, we’re going to become even more productive as we automate, and we’re going to become even less connected to the production, because automation means robotisation and it means that humans are less necessary to that process.

So, what are we all going to be doing? We’re going to be in a world of ultrafast change. It’s really accelerating at the moment and will continue to. And we’re going to have to somehow stay coherent. What are we going to be doing? I think we’re going to be even more full-time artists than we are now. And I don’t just mean the professionals like me, I mean everybody, is going to have to be constantly involved in this activity that I was describing earlier of being able to resynchronise with each other, to connect things together, to be able to make adventurous mind games about different futures, to be able to understand things.

There are some interesting social initiatives now. There’s one called Basic Income. I don’t know if you have heard of that. This is the idea that everybody should get a wage. Everybody. Whether they work or not. So that we simply eliminate poverty in one step like that. There would be no more poor people. You think 'Jesus, that sounds ridiculous.' It isn’t ridiculous, actually - you might want to read about it.

Another thing that tells you about the future we’re moving into is the open-source movement. Where people, instead of producing ideas, carefully defending them, and keeping all the rewards from them are starting to share ideas. You know, Linux, which is the operating system that most of the very big computers run on, is an open-source system. If you wanted to, you could go and change it. Wikipedia is the same kind of thing.

These are both sharing resources that would have seemed unthinkable to share 20 years ago. In fact, I’m sure if you’d mentioned these ideas 20 years ago people would have said that will never happen. And it would never have happened in the economics of the past 200 years.

Altruism. Altruism has a kind of a new face. Writers like William McCaskill are starting to think let’s get rational about altruism. We have to be more altruistic. You know, it’s unsustainable that this tiny sliver of the world that we live in is so rich compared to the rest of the world. You know, if you think the refugee crisis is bad now, you wait. It can’t work that we are so much richer than the rest of the world and not expect them to come and want to take some of it.

So, all of these challenges require us to constantly be remoulding ourselves and when we do remoulding we don’t really do it by sitting down with books of philosophy and rethinking our attitudes from the ground up. Very few of us do that. I’m not one of them either. What we tend to do is we get a sense of what everybody else is thinking about things and we sort of work out our attitudes in relation to everybody else, as we generally think quite collectively.

I think it’s good that we do. I think it’s very important that we have more and more of the mechanisms for doing that. This is why I think we need to be thinking about art and culture not as a little add-on, a bit of luxury, but as the central thing that we do.

I want to finish by reading a passage from Barbara Ehrenreich’s beautiful book which is called Dancing In The Street. The subtitle is 'A History Of Collective Joy'. She says - she was in Brazil - she says, 'The samba school danced down to the sand in perfect dignity, wrapped in their own rhythm, their faces both exhausted and shining with an almost religious kind of exultation. One thin, latte-coloured young man dancing just behind the musicians set the pace. What was he in real life? A bank clerk? A bus boy? But here, in his brilliant feathered costume he was a prince, a mythological figure. Maybe even a god. Here, for a moment, there were no divisions among people except for the playful ones created by Carnival itself.'

'As they reached the boardwalk, bystanders started falling into the rhythm too and without any invitation or announcements, without embarrassment or even alcohol to dissolve the normal constraints of urban life, the samba school turned into a crowd and the crowd into a momentary festival. There was no point to it. No religious overtones, ideological message or money to be made. Just the chance, which we need much more of in this crowded planet, to acknowledge the miracle of our simultaneous existence with some sort of celebration.'

Thank you very much.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/speeches/...

Commons e Cidade...Raquel Rolnik

https://raquelrolnik.wordpress.com/2015/12/03/vitoria-do-movimento-ocupe-estelita-desafio-para-nossas-cidades/

Commons e Educação: "O fato político mais relevante de 2015" por Raquel Rolnik

Operação Lava Jato? Contas do Eduardo Cunha na Suíça? Processo de impeachment da presidente Dilma? Carta do vice-presidente Michel Temer? Nenhum desses é o fato político mais relevante de 2015. A meu ver, 2015 entra para a história política especialmente pela vitoriosa mobilização dos estudantes secundaristas de São Paulo contra o projeto de reorganização das escolas que o governo Alckmin tentou implementar, que, entre outras medidas, fecharia 90 escolas estaduais.

Durante quase um mês, estudantes do ensino médio promoveram ocupações em mais de duzentas escolas e realizaram diversas manifestações públicas nas ruas, sendo violentamente reprimidos pela polícia. Com amplo apoio não apenas de familiares e de setores ligados à área educacional, mas também da população em geral, a mobilização estudantil finalmente levou o governador a recuar da proposta, revogando, no último dia 5, o decreto da reorganização das escolas. No mesmo dia, o secretário de educação entregou sua carta de demissão.

A vitória dos estudantes é o fato político mais importante de 2015 especialmente por três razões. Em primeiro lugar, porque revela o que o imaginário dominante sobre a escola pública oculta: o profundo vínculo dos estudantes com esse espaço. Esse sentimento de pertencimento que a mobilização dos estudantes expressa contraria o discurso hegemônico que costuma resumir a escola pública à ideia de falta de qualidade e a lugar de violência, depredação e abandono. O que testemunhamos neste mês de mobilização foram justamente diversas das qualidades que estão presentes neste lugar.

Segundo, porque no momento em que ocupam um espaço público como a escola, reclamando a necessidade imperiosa de participação ativa nas decisões sobre seu destino, esses estudantes estão afirmando que os espaços públicos não são propriedade privada nem de governos, nem de políticos, mas sim propriedade coletiva dos cidadãos. Por isso não tem cabimento classificar de invasão a ação dos estudantes, como fez sistematicamente o governador. Trata-se, mais propriamente, da ocupação de um espaço que já é deles, e justamente para esclarecer a natureza do que é público, já que muitas vezes governantes e gestores se esquecem disso.

Exatamente por ser a escola pública nossa propriedade coletiva, não cabe a adoção, de cima pra baixo, de políticas que impactam na sua existência, funcionamento e dinâmica, sem qualquer diálogo com a sociedade e, especialmente, com aqueles que vivenciam seu cotidiano: estudantes, professores e funcionários.

A terceira razão é que, diante do cenário catastrófico do mundo político brasileiro atual, jovens com idade entre 15 e 18 anos, em média, dão ao país uma esperança, mostram uma luz no fim desse túnel macabro em que nos encontramos. Essas meninas e meninos estão dando uma verdadeira aula de organização, mobilização e, especialmente, de ressignificação das noções de "público" e de "democracia", ao se apropriar do que é comum, ao exercer formas horizontais e amplas de tomada de decisão, enfrentando a tecnocracia, a discriminação e o autoritarismo, marcas pesadas de nossa organização social e política.

MAKERS cariocas: fazendo E-Commons

http://oglobo.globo.com/sociedade/criador-de-software-para-nasa-tem-laboratorio-tech-em-garagem-no-rio-17665425

http://www.eluaproject.net/overview

Sustentabilidade, a industria de seguros e o futuro dos commons

http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-insurance-industry-wants-a-world-that-is-sustainable-and-insurable/?utm_source=WhatCounts+Publicaster+Edition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=SU+9%2f22%2f15+-+BP+Life+Cycle&utm_content=Principles+for+Sustainable+Insurance+initiative

Thelma Krugger: só diminuir o desmatamento não será suficiente

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/seminariosfolha/2015/09/1684372-apenas-reduzir-desmate-e-irrelevante-contra-aquecimento-diz-especialista.shtml?cmpid=compfb

Quanto custa para produzir água?

Abaixo os links para dois artigos do professor Henrique Chaves com o raciocínio utilizado para estabelecer o valor da água em programas de Pordutores de àgua appoiados pela ANA.

http://eias.utalca.cl/isi/coordinadores/henrique_chaves/chaves_et_al_2__2004.pdf
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbeaa/v13s0/v13s0a15.pdf

Afetadas pela escassez de água, indústrias já avaliam parar produção

http://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2015/08/21/politica/1440193781_969574.html

Agricultura urbana: Suiça

http://awebic.com/cultura/tchau-jardim-ola-horta-comunitaria-veja-como-um-bairro-suico-esta-revolucionando-a-troca-de-comida/

A mudança climática brilha no Times Square

Indo direto ao assunto, duas perguntas conectadas: Como diminuiremos o uso de recursos naturais, quando 2/3 da população mundial começam a consumir produtos e serviços, que nunca consumiram, como celulares e computadores? E se isso for possível como criar fluxos materiais circulares, e qual o papel deles na distribuição do excedente econômico?

Tim Jackson, professor da disciplina de Sustentabilidade da London School of Economics, acredita que não é possível lutar contra o consumismo no curto e médio prazo. Esta é uma cultura que perpassa a vida das pessoas em todos os seus aspectos, em especial os afetivos. É da esfera do estado propor formas de diminuição do uso de recursos naturais. Jackson propôs em seu livro "Prosperity without Growth" um descrescimento do PIB baseado numa criativa macroeconomia ecológica, que lida com três variáveis cruciais para a geração de riqueza e desenvolvimento: divisão do excedente econômico, número de horas trabalhadas por cada trabalhador, e renda mínima. 

Antes de continuar, uma explicação: para manter o nível de aquecimento médio global em 2 graus célsius, segundo o IPCC, será preciso diminuir 80% das emissões globais até 2050. Como fazer isso? Que abordagem de resolução de problemas adotar para chegar perto desse número hipnótico?

Jackson propõe uma economia dual: de um lado às atividades , que fazem crescer o PIB, e de outro uma economia de serviços com atividades que não aumentam o PIB, mas promovem as condições do desenvolvimento: saúde, educação e trocas culturais. Neste modelo de macroeconomia ecológica, as horas do setor de alta produtividade seriam divididas entre a população economicamente ativa, o restante das horas seriam direcionadas á economia dos serviços, que Jackson chama de a “Economia da Cinderela”. Ao mesmo tempo o governo asseguraria a cada família uma renda básica para cobrir as despesas essenciais (saúde, educação, casa, alimentação).

Como diriam os céticos, falta só combinar com os Japoneses.  Mas o que é interessante, é que a meta hipnótica veio para ficar no espaço de nossas prioridades sociais. E eis que (re)surge o movimento Maker, e uma luz se acende: e se, o setor produtivo de alta produtividade fosse paulatinamente substituído pela economia do Craddle to Craddle (do berço ao berço) onde os produtos seriam não só reciclados, mas reusados e recriados em comunidades de cultura maker (ver o vídeo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uIXJclJE2Y). Isso parece um anglicismo para a economia solidária sulamericana, mas a novidade é a presença desse tipo de solidariedade em setores tecnológicos.

A meta hipnótica brilha em um enorme letreiro no Times square. O estado e a iniciativa privada têm pela frente a enorme a tarefa de recriar os produtos e serviços com os quais nos relacionamos, ou recriar a forma como nos relacionamos com produtos e serviços.

Bacia do Paranoá: relatório Belcher

http://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/cidades/2013/11/24/interna_cidadesdf,399959/as-outras-brasilias-conheca-os-lugares-que-poderiam-ter-recebido-a-capital.shtml

Segurança alimentar e Escassez Hídrica

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/HLPE-Report-9_EN.pdf

Universidades ou fábricas?

http://www.cartacapital.com.br/revista/850/universidades-ou-fabricas-253.html

Imigrantes representam um commons para o trabalho coletivo

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/29/universal/es/desbancando-o-mito-do-imigrante-que-rouba-empregos.html

Why economists need a new understanding of human behaviour

https://agenda.weforum.org/2015/05/why-economists-need-a-new-understanding-of-human-behaviour/?utm_content=bufferc4e9b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Saúde Pública é commons: os casos de EUA e Brasil

http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/05/the-struggle-for-universal-healthcare/361854/

Rios enterrados: São Paulo

http://tab.uol.com.br/agua/

Equação do Sistema Cantareira que abastece 5,6 milhões de Paulistas

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/cotidiano/2015/05/1629825-volume-morto-do-sistema-cantareira-faz-um-ano-e-vira-reserva-fixa.shtml

O que é Felicidade: Flávio Gicovate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbHS-FBctnk&list=PLwh_qCSFS-LjlcoD6jsblbChlaT82VFb_

Amor nos tempos longevos: Flávio Gicovate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9puGTP9QXR0

Avaliação da política de mobilidade por bicicletas do Governo de Brasília (2014)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935133/

Dicas de redação científica em Inglês

/http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3935133/

Regiões Rurais do Brasil (2015)

http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/geografia/default_regioes_rurais.shtm

2015: grave seca no Sudeste e Nordeste

http://noticias.uol.com.br/ultimas-noticias/agencia-estado/2015/05/05/ana-alerta-para-ano-extremamente-grave-no-abastecimento-de-agua.htm

The Climate change and the Pope

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/28/world/europe/pope-francis-steps-up-campaign-on-climate-change-to-conservatives-alarm.html

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/pope-franciss-new-climate-change-encyclical-sneak-preview-2015-04-09?page=2

Sabesp e a venda de água

http://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2015/04/29/politica/1430334294_071351.html

Aonde uma criança pobre tem mais oportunidades nos EUA...

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/05/03/upshot/the-best-and-worst-places-to-grow-up-how-your-area-compares.html?abt=0002&abg=1

Casca de laranja ajuda a limpar a "bagaça" que polui o solo...confere ai!

http://planetasustentavel.abril.com.br/blog/blog-da-redacao/inovador-brasileiro-usa-substancia-da-casca-da-laranja-para-limpar-solos-contaminados/?utm_source=redesabril_psustentavel&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=redesabril_psustentavel_blogdaredacao

Plantando água...em Lima, Peru

http://planetasustentavel.abril.com.br/blog/urbanidades/como-uma-tecnologia-de-mil-anos-vai-abastecer-lima/?utm_source=redesabril_psustentavel&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=redesabril_psustentavel_urbanidades

Pegada Hídrica!

http://flowingdata.com/2015/04/07/gallons-of-water-to-produce-foods/

A água revela o despreparo do Brasil para enfrentar os impactos do clima

http://www.sosma.org.br/artigo/agua-revela-o-despreparo-brasil-para-enfrentar-os-impactos-clima/

Gestão Sustentável da Àgua

http://opiniao.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,gestao-sustentavel-da-agua-imp-,1665032
O material jornalístico produzido pelo Estadão é protegido por lei. Para compartilhar este conteúdo, utilize o link:http://opiniao.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,gestao-sustentavel-da-agua-imp-,1665032
O material jornalístico produzido pelo Estadão é protegido por lei. Para compartilhar este conteúdo, utilize o link:http://opiniao.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,gestao-sustentavel-da-agua-imp-,1665032

Morro do Urubu: memórias de um ambientalista candango

Minha primeira aventura ambientalista, aos 20 anos, foi fotografar um cactus raro do cerrado que está presente no morro do Urubu na serra da Cafuringa. Veja a reportágem do DF-TV sobre o lugar:

http://globotv.globo.com/rede-globo/dftv-1a-edicao/t/edicoes/v/morro-do-urubu-e-ideal-para-praticar-escalada/4032534/

Tempo é Commons (Raduan Nassar, Lavoura Arcaica)

"O tempo é o maior tesouro de que o homem pode dispor. Embora inconsumível, o tempo é o nosso melhor alimento. Sem medida que o conheça, o tempo é o nosso bem de maior grandeza. Não tem começo, não tem fim. Rico não é o homem que coleciona e se pesa num amontoado de moedas nem aquele devasso que se estende mãos e braços em terras largas. Rico é só o homem que aprendeu piedoso a conviver com o tempo aproximando se dele com ternura, não se rebelando contra o seu curso brindando antes com sabedoria para receber os favores e não sua ira. O equilíbrio da vida esta essencialmente nesse bem supremo e quem souber com acerto a quantidade de vagar ou de espera que se deve por nas coisas não corre nunca o risco ao buscar por elas e defrontar-se com o que não é pois só a justa medida do tempo dá a justa natureza das coisas"

Ladislau Dowbor: O direito ao ódio parece superar todos os outros (Maria Frô)

http://www.revistaforum.com.br/mariafro/2015/03/27/ladislau-dowbor-o-direito-ao-odio-parece-superar-todos-os-outros/

Democracia, 30 anos

https://raquelrolnik.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/democracia-30-anos/

Geografia Agrária da Crise dos Alimentos no Brasil (Carlos Eduardo Porto Gonçalves)

http://www.geografia.fflch.usp.br/graduacao/apoio/Apoio/Apoio_Marta/2010/FLG0566/Porto-Gon%C3%BEalves_e_Alentejano.pdf

Fome: o ingênuo otimismo da ONU

http://outraspalavras.net/posts/fome-o-ingenuo-otimismo-da-onu/

Jean Ziegler: Destruição massiva e Geopolítica da fome

https://florestasdofuturo.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/geopolitica-da-fome.pdf

Conhecer e comer: caminhos para redescobrir a comida de verdade

Conhecer e comer: caminhos para redescobrir a comida de verdade

Perspectiva do Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira


Data: 24/03/2015
Horário: 8h30 às 18h00
Local: Auditório Roxinho do Centro de Ciências de Matemática e da Natureza (CCMN) - UFRJ

Programação
8h30 – inscrições e abertura
Professora Glória Valéria da Veiga – Diretora do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro
Professor Mércio Gomes – Coordenador do HCTE

9h30 às 10h30 – Conferência com o Professor Carlos Augusto Monteiro (Nupens/USP)

10h30 às 11h10 – Conferência com Maria Emília Lisboa Pacheco (Consea Nacional)

11h10 às 12h30 – Painel 1: Alimentos ultraprocessados, conveniência para quem?
Princípio 1 (Guia alimentar): Alimentação é mais do que ingestão de nutrientes.

Convidados: Professoras Cláudia Olsieski (Nutrição/Estácio de Sá), Giane Moliari (Nutrição/UniRio) e Inês Rugani (Nutrição/UERJ)
Mediador: Professor Alexandre Brasil (NUTES/UFRJ)
Abordagem: Breve panorama sobre a industrialização dos alimentos até chegar aos ultraprocessados, com alto teor publicitário. O livro Food Politics, de Marion Nestlé, é esclarecedor ao demonstrar como a agroindústria, por meio do marketing, atuou para estimular o consumo de nutrientes ao invés de alimentos. Compreensão dos obstáculos (Guia Alimentar): Publicidade infantil
Palavras-chaves: Conhecer e comer

12h30 às 12h40 - Mensagem de Michael Pollan.

12h40 às 14h30 – Almoço + visita às salas temáticas + feira agroecológica

14h30 às 15h30 – Painel 2:  Soberania Alimentar, soberania consumidora e cidadã
Princípio 4 (Guia alimentar): Diferentes saberes geram o conhecimento.
Convidados: Dra. Daniela Sanches Frozi (FIOCRUZ/DF PALIN), Professora Luciene Burlandy (Faculdade de Nutrição/UFF) e Representante do Ministério da Saúde.
Mediador: Professor Renato Maluf (CPDA-UFRRJ)
Abordagem: Segurança e Soberania Alimentar; Políticas para ampliação de escolhas alimentares; desenvolvimento de estratégias e ações intersetoriais para Educação Alimentar e Nutricional.
Compreensão dos obstáculos (Guia Alimentar): Conceder maior valor ao processo de adquirir, preparar e consumir alimentos.
Palavras-chave: Confiança, cuidado

15h30 às 15h40 – Mensagem de Marion Nestle

15h40 às 16h00 - INTERVALO

16h00 às 16h30 – Bate-papo: Todos podem e devem cozinhar
Convidada: Regina Tchelly (Favela Orgânica)
Princípio 5 (Guia alimentar): Guias alimentares ampliam a autonomia nas escolhas alimentares.
Abordagem: A habilidade culinária ganha destaque no Guia como uma das possibilidades para vencer os obstáculos à alimentação saudável. Regina irá compartilhar como a cozinha transformou a sua vida. Também irá sugerir ideias de como desenvolver essa habilidade e apresentar seus estudos com aproveitamento integral de alimentos.
Palavras-chaves: Cozinhar, Carinho

16h30 às 17h15 – Palestra: Descolonização da cultura alimentar
Palestrante: Professor Carlos Walter Porto-Gonçalves (Departamento de Geografia/ UFF)
Princípio 3 (Guia Alimentar): Alimentação adequada e saudável deriva de sistema alimentar social e ambientalmente sustentável.
Abordagem: O conceito de sistema-mundo moderno colonial, a colonização do poder e o modo de produção de conhecimento. O que significa a descolonização do saber? Quais os caminhos para uma ecologia dos saberes?
Compreensão dos obstáculos (Guia Alimentar): Reflexão sobre a importância que a alimentação tem ou pode ter para suas vidas.

17h15 às 18h00 – Encerramento e encaminhamentos
Professor Carlos Augusto Monteiro (Nupens/USP)
Representante do Ministério da Saúde
Princípio 2 (Guia Alimentar): Recomendações alimentares devem estar em sintonia com o seu tempo.
Abordagem: vivemos a Era dos Ultraprocessados, alimentos com alto teor de publicidade, conveniência, fabricados com excesso de sal, açúcar e gordura. Daí, importância de CONHECER! Conhecer para comer. Conhecer para Contestar; Conhecer para des-Colonizar o Conhecimento; Conhecer para reivindicar Cultura; Conhecer para Cuidar da saúde e do ambiente; Conhecer para Cozinhar; Conhecer para exercer Cidadania.

Realização e organização:                                                              
Este evento é realizado e organizado pelo Programa de História das Ciências, das Técnicas e Epistemologia (HCTE) e pelo Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro (INJC), ambos da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).
Coordenação executiva
Glória Valéria da Veiga – diretora do INJC/UFRJ
Mércio Gomes - coordenador do HCTE/UFRJ
Comissão organizadora
Ana Luisa Kremer Faller (INJC)
Gabriel Fernandes (HCTE)
Jean Phillipe Lafond (HCTE)
José Carlos de Oliveira (HCTE)
Juliana Dias (HCTE)
Letícia Tavares (INJC)
Mónica Chiffoleau (HCTE)
Roberta Castro (HCTE)
Taís de Souza Lopes (INJC)
Valéria Caselato (INJC)

Serviço
Evento: Conhecer e comer: caminhos para redescobrir a comida de verdade – perspectiva do Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira
Data: 24/03/2015
Horário: 8h30 às 18h00
Local: Auditório Roxinho do Centro de Ciências de Matemática e da Natureza (CCMN)
Endereço: Av. Athos da Silveira Ramos, 274 - Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro - RJ.
Inscrições:  o evento é gratuito, mas é necessário fazer inscrição prévia pelo e-mail hcte@ufrj.br ou através do telefone 3938-9493
Informações: http://www.hcte.ufrj.br/ e http://www.nutricao.ufrj.br/index.htm

Otimismo Ecológico ou "Nossa Senhora das Vagas"

Segundo algunas cientistas integrantes do Painel de Mudanças Climáticas da ONU, já teria passado o ponto de retorno das catastrofes ecológicas que nos esperam a frente, e no curto prazo. Continua...

La Macaxerie

Ao lado de minha casa abriu-se uma nova padaria. Uma padaria francesa, uma Boulangerie. Como havia escrito em outro post do blog, o trigo chega ao Brasil na década de 20 do século passado, mesmo não sendo totalmente digerível pelos Brasileiros, e demais habitantes do sul do planeta. Outro aspecto dessa dificuldade de adaptação do trigo ao ambiente tropical e sub-tropical é que o melhoramenteo genético tradicional que garantiu a geração de plantas mais resistentes aos condições do sul do planeta aumentou seu conteúdo de gluten, proteina do grão de trigo que se acumula no trato intestinal ocasianando o mal funcionamento do orgão.

Ao passar em frente a nova padaria imaginei que poderiamos ter uma "La Macaxerie", que seria como uma padaria de produtos alimentícios derivados da mandioca, ou macaxeira, em sua denominação mais comum na região nordeste do Brasil. Toda a culinária da mandioca seria servida: bolos, doces, tapiocas, pães, beiju, farinha de puba com os mais diferentes recheios e coberturas. A mandioca fornece um carboidrato de fácil digestibilidade e rico em vitamina C. È uma planta adaptada a diferentes tipos de solos, rústica e de boa produtividade, baixa demanda hídrica e resistente á pragas.

La Macaxerie se disseminaria rapidamente pelo Brasil e pelo mundo. Isso faria justiça a riqueza da cultura alimentar da nossa Macaxeira.

p.s: uma filial em Paris seria natural..

O Cacau da Africa é das Américas

http://viajeaqui.abril.com.br/materias/o-futuro-da-comida-chocolate-chocolatras-sao-tome-e-principe#1

Jung: "Commons" interior.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qxz1YfJOgQ

IPAM participa do 'Sexta com Debate' do MDS sobre Bolsa Verde, Bolsa Floresta e pagamentos por serviços ambientais

IPAM participa do 'Sexta com Debate' do MDS sobre Bolsa Verde, Bolsa Floresta e pagamentos por serviços ambientais

O Ministério de Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome promoveu na última sexta-feira, 14, um debate sobre Bolsa Verde e Bolsa Floresta com o consultor ambiental Osmar Coelho Filho, especialista em Agroecologia e Fellow, para a América do Sul, da ONG Youth for Environmental Sanity.

O Sexta com Debate é realizado quinzenalmente, com apresentações relacionadas aos temas de interesse para as políticas de desenvolvimento social e combate à fome. O tema da apresentação foi “Bolsa Floresta, Bolsa Verde: da transferência de renda à produção de serviços ambientais”,onde o palestrante apresentou seus estudos sobre os mecanismos de transferência de renda com enfoque na redução do desmatamento na Amazônia e algumas experiências que estudou em sua pesquisa.

O IPAM, por meio do projeto Assentamentos Sustentáveis, tem uma iniciativa de pagamentos por serviços ambientais no Pará e participou do evento no intuito de discutir os mecanismos e modelos que utilizará ao efetuar o pagamento e como estes influenciam em outros programas de benefícios e transferência de renda, como o Bolsa Família e obter informações sobre experiências com essa ferramenta do REDD na Amazônia.

Segundo Osmar, um dos melhores modelos de PSA atualmente é o apresentado pelo estado do Acre, que categoriza os produtores de acordo com vários critérios e realiza o pagamento dos serviços de acordo com essas categorias, pagando mais para quem presta mais serviços. Ele também falou da importância do fortalecimento dos mecanismos de gestão dentro das comunidades e assentamentos por meio de associações, que é um dos critérios das bolsas em questão, e da importância de tornar essas famílias autônomas e capazes de gerir seus próprios recursos.

Funcionários do MMA e MDS participaram do evento e esclareceram que essas bolsas não possuem o intuito de ser um PSA e sim pretendem ser uma base de renda para os moradores das regiões de floresta, para que eles não precisem recorrer a esses recursos para obter renda.

Restaurante lixo zero!

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/comida/2015/02/1595139-restaurante-em-brighton-diz-ser-o-1-do-reino-unido-a-nao-gerar-lixo.shtml

Slides de Mudança Climática

http://pt.slideshare.net/saepr/brasil-2040-cenrios-e-alternativas-para-adaptao-mudana-do-clima-impactos-sobre-agricultura

Mudança Climática e Hidroelétricas

http://observatoriodoclima.eco.br/clima-quente-ameaca-geracao-em-hidreletricas-no-brasil

Entrevista com Michael Pollan

http://canaldocampoamesa.com.br/2014/08/14/entrevista-com-michael-pollan/

Mercado viciado em junk food

http://www.pagina22.com.br/index.php/2013/12/mercado-viciado-em-junk-food/

Participação X Disparidades de Renda (estudo do FMI)

http://www.pressprogress.ca/en/post/rise-income-inequality-linked-decline-unions-new-imf-study

A economia do Brasil pós-didatura: um resumo ou o sumo da crise atual (de Luis Nassif)

http://jornalggn.com.br/noticia/aguardando-o-senhor-crise

SLY & THE FAMILY STONE "Everyday People"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUUhDoCx8zc

Sometimes I'm right and I can be wrong
My own beliefs are in my song
The butcher, the banker, the drummer and then
Makes no difference what group I'm in
I am everyday people, yeah, yeah

There is a blue one
Who can't accept the green one
For living with a fat one
Trying to be a skinny one
Different strokes
For different folks

And so on and so on
And scooby dooby dooby
Oh sha sha
We got to live together

I am no better and neither are you
We are the same, whatever we do
You love me, you hate me, you know me and then
You can't figure out the bag I'm in
I am everyday people, yeah yeah

There is a long hair
That doesn't like the short hair
For being such a rich one
That will not help the poor one
Different strokes
For different folks

And so on and so on
And scooby dooby dooby
Oh sha sha
We got to live together

There is a yellow one
That won't accept the black one
That won't accept the red one
That won't accept the white one
Different strokes
For different folks

And so on and so on
And scooby dooby dooby
Oh sha sha
I am everyday people

Taps Start to Run Dry in Brazil’s Largest City

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/17/world/americas/drought-pushes-sao-paulo-brazil-toward-water-crisis.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=Moth-Visible&module=inside-nyt-region&region=inside-nyt-region&WT.nav=inside-nyt-region&_r=1

Economia de àgua: simples assim!

Apocalipse ontem (Amartya Sen, economista indiano, Nobel de Economia)

Resenha do livro "Os Últimos Holocaustos Vitorianos" de Mike Davis 

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/mais/fs0403200108.htm

Late Victorians Holocausts
464 págs., US$ 27
de Mike Davis. Ed. Verso (EUA)

A água e as cidades no Brasil

http://cosmopista.com/

Excelente blog de Daniel, que é arquiteto e estudou gestão da água urbana. Ele escreve de um modo sintético á respeito das conexões entre hidrologia, saneamento, uso do solo e crescimento das cidades.

Meio Ambiente e Alimentos

Essa é uma relação antiga. Tudo que nos alimenta vem do meio que nos circunda. É natural e está na cultura. O famoso mestre Pastinha da Bahia, grande capoeierista, dizia: "Capoeira é tudo que se come". Na capoeira , a roda antropofágica é um teatro dos desejos, dores, fugas e defesas. Ambiente é tudo que se come, eu poderia parafrasear o amigo de Jorge Amado. Mas essa história continua...

Tell EPA, protect farmworkers now!

http://www.panna.org/issues/related-actions/tell-epa-protect-farmworkers-now

Tecnologia reutiliza 95% da água desperdiçada no banho

https://queminova.catracalivre.com.br/inventa/tecnologia-reutiliza-95-da-agua-desperdicada-no-banho/

Make the simple to be complex and creative: make the complex to be workable

I have been thinking for a long time that people and societies always look for simple things, simple statements, and explanations to deal with reality. Why? In truth, what is simple is complex but the problem is that when I make things simpler to deal with them I may deal wrongly with them. Reductions may take the best part of the problem resolution that is inside of the problem. The idea of this article ( this is just the beginning) is to open an overview of things to grasp the complexity before workable reductions. By doing so you will always remember how complex is your problem down the road when the uncertainties may materialize and appear.

Chocolate Noir: nutrição e charme ancestral

O cacau quando saiu do Mexico para as mesas Europeias atingiu todas as classes sociais, e era visto como um alimento energético e saboroso por todos. Foi um dos poucos alimentos que traziam os nobres para dentro da cozinha para experimentar e criar novos blends. O leite faz parte destas misturas, mas o ingrediente principal sempre foi o fruto do cacaueiro do novo mundo. Cada lugar na Europa tinha suas receitas favoritas: cacau com bebidas alcoolicas, com café, etc. O nome e a formulação original é mexicana, ou melhor, Azteca: Chocolatl.

As plantas de cacau são originárias do México? Não, elas são originárias da floresta Amazônica. Os Aztecas teriam vindo até a região para coletar suas sementes e plantas.  Na Amazônia maranhense, ou meio-oeste, era comum o consumo do suco do cacau e das amendoas mas não do chocolate, ou qualquer outra forma de preparo usando o cacau. No Brasil frutos como o Cupuaçu são primos do cacau e ocorrem na mesma região. 

Há pelo menos 4 correntes científicas que estudam essa origem  localizando-a no: Equador, Colombia, Peru e Brasil. As plantas e suas sementes poderiam ter sido transportados dos 4 lugares até a peninsula de Yacatan mas qual foi a principal rota? Interessante notar que a maior área produtora no Brasil está no estado da Bahia que fica na floresta atlântica que margeia o litoral, longe da floresta Amazônica.

Impresciona  a capacidade que o cacau tem de gerar identidades culturais nos os países que disputam sua origem. Além disso é um poderoso estimulante bioquímico (ver link abaixo).

http://foodrevolution.org/blog/chocolates-startling-health-benefits/

Água virtual: vendendo água na forma de alimentos

O que a estabilidade da região do Nilo tem haver como Brasil? Sem os alimentos brasileiros exportados para o Egito e vizinhos, a estabilidade da região estaria ameaçada devido aos conflitos por recusos hídricos. Ver o link abaixo:


http://www.unesco.org/new/es/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/facts-and-figures/all-facts-wwdr3/fact-25-virtual-water-flows/